This post is a set of ramblings which may sound a bit incoherent but needed to be grouped together to give an overview about some of the things that needed to considered about Electronic Patient record/Electronic Medical record.
Mandatory Pre-Requisite
In my view a mandatory pre-requisite for meeting the many objectives of Electronic Patient Record (EPR) is the ability of that application to support semantic interoperability of clinical information. What I mean by that is the Entry, storage and communication of clinical information by the application in ways that allow it to be consistently reused, retrieved and processed by it and its ability to communicate that information to different software applications. However maintaining Semantic Operability is not so easy due to various issues
• Technical issues
– Different information models
– Different clinical terminologies
– Different interfaces between information models and terminologies
• Practical issues
– Different perspectives on similar information
– Different motivations for data entry
– Different methods of data entry
– Different expectations about the use of information
Barriers
From my practical experience, implementation/deployment of EPR is not very easy; there are lots of barriers in implementing EPR. I jotted down a few of the barriers which needed to bottomed down in the business plan before deciding to implement EPR.
• Financial and Capital costs associated with the EPR applications
• Adoption of the systems mainly by clinicians and to some extent by auxiliary clinicians. Most organizations underestimate the training required for their staff to adopt the new system but also fail to convince them.
• Defining technology and information standards and adhering to them. I know in some cases it becomes expensive to adhere to them but if you start compromising then there will be no end to it.
•In some cases if the organization already has a legacy system the transition phase adds work to an already overburdened IT staff.
•Of course the now famous Information Governance issues covering security, privacy and consent to access the electronic records.
• In some cases the failure to define clear and tangible benefits also becomes a barrier
Standards
EMR’s and almost any other information-oriented system in a clinical environment cannot be used without well-defined standards for representing and communicating information. Data need to be exchanged between multiple, heterogeneous systems and might be used by very different applications .The following points highlight the need for standards
• Unavailable standardized communication results in health hazards, e.g. drug hypersensitivity
• Patients are starting to demand that ”their” data should be available online
• Improve efficiency by enabling professional cooperation in new ways
• Quality management requires aggregated data
• Standards allow integration of modular systems from different suppliers
• Many standards issues require professionals and authorities not just industry
• Standards can lower costs of ICT support by expanding the market
Failure Reasons
The failure of certain organisations in implementing Electronic Patient Record in my view is the failure to understand basic standardisation approaches in healthcare organisations. There are two standardisation approaches in theory
• External standardisation
– Strategic planning tool
– Market reassurance
– Consensus approach
• Internal standardisation
– Strategic enhancement of the use of internal resources
– Change management is essential
– Class discussion: regulatory and laissez-faire approaches to internal standardisation
Implementing EPR at a single organisation of multiple organisations read hospitals is essentially setting an internal standard for information processes related to patient information
– Regulatory approach: set the standard way for all possible situations involving production of patient information
– Laissez-faire approach: describe all accepted standard procedures and allow hospital staff to choose which standards to use or invent their own procedures, if necessary
– Regulatory approach: set the standard way for all possible situations involving production of patient information
– Laissez-faire approach: describe all accepted standard procedures and allow hospital staff to choose which standards to use or invent their own procedures, if necessary
Just wished they had known which approach to use.
